3 Possible Election Outcome & Share Market Reaction

* Note: This is NOT a political post. Instead, we're talking about share market movement based on possible election outcome. Abusive comments are strictly prohibited and will be remove automatically.

Local investors have been staying sideline for months ago. Do you started to feel itchy now? Honestly, this is the feeling of mine as an investor, from being active to passive lately. I can't wait to start investing again in share market. However, we shouldn't simply jump in next Monday, right? Let's see the 3 possible election outcome and how market may react accordingly...

OUTCOME #1: BN retained power

Judging by the strong influx of foreign funds flooding local share market prior to election, this is definitely their expected outcome. If materialize, Monday market generally will rally. However, I expect this kind of rally will be short-lived, and turning downward after that. Why? Simply ask yourself these questions: When is the better time to take profit if not that time?

OUTCOME #2: Opposition Alliances won

Many people predicted that market will react negatively to this kind of election outcome. It's not strange. Anyway, once all the worries have settled down, new cabinet was formed, share market will recover. So, an U-shaped rebound is my bet.

OUTCOME #3: Almost 50/50 for Both

This is the worst outcome for share market. A hung parliament does not bode well for the nation. In this situation, very likely, elected assemblyman may jump-ship to another coalition vice versa. So, share market very likely will through months of instability. Dead share market was expected.

Even said so, Bursa Malaysia will definitely still be operating, not as published in one of the advertisement by political party. Hahaha. It's funny to see that kind of advertisement.

5 Things to Know before 13th General Election

Are you bored of the recent elections hoo-haa ? It's all coming from either party from different side, some NGOs, and some political related persons. How about foreigners? What are they thinking about our Malaysia General Election? Here you go...

In this note, Morgan Stanley outline the 5 things they think investors need to know regarding Malaysia elections:

1. What's upcoming? Setting the context
   The 13th General Elections are due to be held very soon in Malayia. Parliament needs to be dissolved no later than April 2013, and elections need to be held no later than 60 days from date of its dissolution.
   
   
2. Which are the key states to monitor?
   They are Kedah, Penang, Selangor, Perak, Johor, Sabah and Sarawak.
3. Election scenarios and macro implications
   BN Parliamentary seat share of > 63% would be seen as a positive surprise for investors. BN Parliamentary seat share of < mid 50% would be seen as a negative risk event by investors and could have implications for leadership and government stability. The political landscape will determine momentum of reform agenda.
4. Policy comparison: Pakatan Rakyat (PR) vs Barisan Nasional (BN)
   The broad economic thrust of PR policy is fairly similar to that of BN. However, PR campaign proposals have a more leftist slant and also focus on policy devolvement to state governments, more geographically balanced economic development, and strengthening of decentralization in Sabah and Sarawak.
5. What to expect in UMNO Party elections?
   UMNO elections have to be held by Jun-2013. The president of UNMO is historically the prime minister, and hence, this will determine whether there is leadership stability. Forthcoming elections will take place amid constitutional amendments which makes the process more democratic.

* NO abusive comments were allowed. Thanks.

Source: Morgan Stanley research report dated 18th Feb 2013

CLSA Malaysia Politics Market Strategy

There is no better time to blog about this post. After the plunge of KLCI yesterday, citing election risk, we came across an interesting research report by CLSA. As such, we would like to take this opportunity to share with you.

By CLSA,

An unexpected opposition Pakatan Rakyat (PR) coalition victory in the impending 13th General Election (13GE) would spark a broad sell-off in Ringgit assets. Changes of government are not uncommon in ASEAN. Looking at the experience of Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines over the last decade, parliamentary control has seen significant shifts and governance has been possible despite the lack of a parliamentary majority. However, Malaysia has never experienced a change in government, meaning any change will come as a shock and with a host of uncertainties.

From an equity and debt market perspective, Malaysia has always enjoyed a political premium for the stability in governance and policy-setting stemming from majority control of parliament. The immediate financial market repercussions can be grouped as follows:

• Equity and bond markets sell-offs are likely as Malaysia's political stability premium is erased, at least temporarily. Domestic corporate, many of which have deep links with the existing government, will be putting big-ticket decisions on hold pending guidance on continuity;
• Ringgit depreciation can be expected in parallel with the sell-off in Malaysian assets by foreign investors. This will pose another drag on broad corporate and foreign investor confidence, especially foreign debt (though positive impact on exporters should not be forgotten).
• And, subsequently draw unfavorable attention from international rating agencies.

Near-term policy expectations

• PR's stated policies are broadly aimed at raising disposable incomes, improving fiscal governance (key revenue generator), and encouraging private investment.
• Higher minimum wage and lower car prices will support consumer spending, while cutting ASEAN-topping corporate tax rate would reassure corporate and investors.
• State oil company Petronas will get more resources to invest in rebuilding reserves.

Medium-long term policy focus

• PR's desire to "rebalance" government contracts and agreements means negative overhangs for state-dependent entities i.e. utilities, concessionaires, construction.
• Banks as large holders of private sector bonds will face negative risk perception.
• Reversing GLC dominance (Iskandar not impacted) will boost private investment and FDI; Khazanah could accelerate local asset disposals, lifting Bursa's free-float.

"Rain or Shine" stock picks

• At the macro level, companies with government-dependent contracts, licenses and concessions will see sustained negative overhang and discounting, while consumer and oil & gas sectors will benefit from rising disposable income and Petronas capex.
• Our "rain or shine" stock picks are expected to do well under either a BN or PR-led government, with earnings underpinned by higher disposable incomes, Petronas association, overseas earnings contribution buffer and a weaker currency.
• A market sell-off would be a prime opportunity to add to positions in Axiata, PGas, UEM Land, IHH, Sapura Kencana, AirAsia and exporters e.g. rubber glove players.

Source: CLSA Asia-Pacific

What's Wrong for an Economist to Predict the Upcoming Election?

I am writing this post during midnight after I came across a report saying that Bank Islam chief economist suspended after predicting that opposition will win the upcoming election. As usual, Finance Malaysia would NOT include political elements in its blog post. And, we would like to stress here again, that we are discussing this topic WITHOUT any political elements. Then, what are we talking here?

FREEDOM of VOICE & OPINION

I knew that I could not sleep if I didn't speak up for En. Azrul Anwar. We are not here to defend anyone, neither to offend any parties. But, we should open up our mind, and accept other opinions with open heart. In this matter, the said bank is losing its credibility and reputation by suspending one of its key staff --- just because of his prediction. Why can't he speak freely? Will the bank lose its banking license because of this?

Does he answer the question wrongly? NO... It's a prediction only, there is no right or wrong here.

Everyone knew that political changes is the key risk for Malaysian economy this year. Can an economist avoid this topic? Or, should they answer the same question with the same biased answer? Otherwise, who will listen to their opinions? Then, why a company hires an economist to represent them in the first place?

Funny... That's why Finance Malaysia blog is another channel for investors and readers to get 3rd party opinions and views. Blogging industry will prosper even faster, because the demand is there. Readers DO NOT want to read biased newspaper or news portal anymore. Thanks for your support. Finance Malaysia supports Azrul Anwar.

What is US "Fiscal Cliff" actually?

When everyone thought that US and the world will be better if Obama won his presidential re-election again, world equities markets today declines with US being the most serious market by dropping more than 2%. What's the reason? Answer: Fiscal Cliff ?

Hmmm... Then, what is fiscal cliff actually which many of us on the street do not even heard about this new term before. No worry, Finance Malaysia blog did his homework over here. Share this out if you like.

Understanding Fiscal Cliff...

The US fiscal cliff refers to the effect of a series of enacted legislation which, if unchanged, will result in tax increases, spending cuts, and a corresponding reduction in the budget deficit. With Obama retaining the presidency, it sends the signal that it's US government policies will pretty much stay the same as previous 4 years. Ben Bernanke will stay as Fed chairman, which also meaning that the open-ended liquidity and bond buying programs will continue, fueling risk taking appetite of equity and fixed income markets for the foreseeable future.

Budget deficits, projected through 2022. The "CBO Baseline" shows the effects of the fiscal cliff under current law. The "Alternative Scenario" represents what would happen if Congress extends the Bush tax cuts and repeals the Budget Control Act-mandated spending reductions beyond the end of 2012.

However, Obama has to resume his duties in a very likely divided congress, with Republicans controlling the House and Democrats controlling the Senate. With this political deadlock and the looming "Fiscal Cliff", that's the reason why US market sink this morning.

Good or Bad?

If you understand it, the so called "Fiscal Cliff" is not something bad, in which its purpose is to reduce budget deficit of US. What investors worried was the measures being taken will slow the already slow growth rate of US economy, subsequently the world economies including Asia. But, without the intention of reducing budget deficit of US, would you be more confident? Of course NOT, because US would never able to not walk out from the brushes. Right?

By now, you should be able to understand the term. Meanwhile, some analysts have argued that "fiscal slope" or "fiscal hill" would be more appropriate because while the cumulative economic effect over all would be substantial, it would not be felt immediately but rather gradually as the weeks and months went by. Hahaha...

Can Malaysia Trust 'Mat Rempit'?

First of all, Happy Merdeka to all Malaysians. Yup, we love peace and prosperity as mentioned by our beloved prime minister. 55th years of independence would not come true without unity of people from various races. No doubt, we Malaysians are from various background. Yet, we have come together, good or bad, to shape our nation until what we already achieve today. Anyway, Finance Malaysia hopes our nation can transform itself by realizing the 2020 vision "Developed Nation".

Just when everyone was celebrating today, I came across one news titled "Mat Rempit to help fight crime" and my writing instinct once again being activated. Fighting crime by collaborating with Mat Rempit? This is the first reaction I believed many readers would asked!!!

Don't we know that Mat Rempit were those who rides their motorcycle dangerously?

Don't we know that Mat Rempit were those riders that endangered the life of other road users?

And, I really don't know how and why our government came out this "think-out-of-the-box" idea!!!

Two Immediate Side Effects

Okay. We try to be neutral now. Maybe Mat Rempit really can help us to fight crime, and maybe they got "lubang" to detect crime, we have come out with these few immediate side effects once launched.

1. Privileged. They got these special privilege to join police personnel. How about other "gang"? Are we accepting them in our society as a good rempit?
2. Pride. Exactly, don't you think that being a Mat Rempit in Malaysia was so "cool"? This was like a statement to recruit more people to join them rempits everywhere. I'm not sure how effective they can in fighting crime, but what i'm sure of is this would attract more youngsters to rempit.

If they are really good, why in the first place become a rempit? Why don't they join our police personnel to formally fight crime? And the last point was this idea was first mooted by one political party to engage with mat rempits. And now this was mooted by Home ministry, in other words Malaysia Government. Hey dude, how did foreigners look at Malaysia on this matter? Positively or negatively? I think majority of Malaysians have the unpleasant answer...

Previously

Nowadays

Should Government Abolish PTPTN Loans?

Once again, PTPTN (Malaysia National Higher Education Loan) came to the limelight lately with the wrong reasons. In conjunction with this, Finance Malaysia did a survey on Facebook Page asking our fans "Should Government Abolish PTPTN Loans?", and guess the answer given by majority of them? NO.

Emmm... What does this mean? It's pretty clear that majority of us thinks that PTPTN should be continue for the following reasons:

1. There is no FREE lunch in this world
2. Borrowers should repay what he borrows
3. The scheme did already help many financially distressed students pursuing tertiary education

Thanks for your participation in the survey. Yet, many readers keep asking Finance Malaysia, our view on this matter. Before answering you, we also highlighted that this blog is of freedom of speech, we're not political driven blog, and we tend to be political-neutral in writing. Below is our view on this issue:

1. We agreed that there is no free lunch, especially in Malaysia. We should change our mentality that Government owe us this and that things. We must put in our own efforts to make things happen, and Government's role is to facilitate the process to become easier and smoother. This is why PTPTN loan was offered at the beginning.
   
   
2. Regarding the interest rate charged, it's a mere 3% only. Does it really sky high? Definitely not. Why PTPTN charged 3%? This was because our inflation rate is around that figure. If you take last year inflation rate of 3.5% into calculation, PTPTN are making losses actually, although we repay back with 3% interest rate.
   
   
3. Without interest, anyone of us who qualify to go into varsities will take PTPTN loan, whether he/she is serious in his/her study or not. Why not borrow the money to spend, instead of study, if given free?
   
   
4. Without interest, what is the incentive for student to repay back the borrow amount as soon as possible? Without interest, I will be the one who use whatever money I have now to invest, do business, buy gadgets... last is PTPTN. Agree?
   
   
5. We believe this is one of the agenda purposely created by certain political parties to fish young voters, saying that they will abolish and cleared their outstanding PTPTN loan once they formed the new Government. (Please be neutral on this matter, then only think)
   
   
6. By writing-off the outstanding PTPTN loans amounting to billions of ringgit, Malaysia sure will went into financially distressed level. Then, all of the subsidies will be removed, public sector salary will be cut, all of us will protest because of this. Do you really want this to happen?
   
   

Anyway, this is one of the interesting preview running up to the anticipated general election. Finance Malaysia hopes that political parties from both sides should focus on things that really can benefiting the country. What's the point to form a new Government that will go into bankruptcy?

Before ending this posts, we must highlighted here that Government must clear the doubts by sorting it out fast. If not, many borrowers will wait and stop repayment in anticipating that Government will abolish it soon.

Another point was we lauded PTPTN's intention to reward those prompt and disciplined borrowers with a reduced 1% interest rate. However, why not PTPTN automatically reducing it without much hassle for borrowers to appeal? Now, borrowers must request > wait for revised terms and conditions agreement > print and sign > guarantors signatures > employers details > auto-deductions from salary > return back to PTPTN. Since these are eligible good paymasters, why not treati them automatically?

Annual Strategy 2012 by TA Securities

2011 had triggered a wave of unwanted chain effects, which would not languish but resonate further into 1H12. While Japan is recovering from the worst ever tsunami and nuclear disaster, and oil prices stabilized after the unrest in the Middle East, conditions in Europe are expected to worsen before stabilizing.

Global Economy – Risk Factors Extending into 2012

Positive news flows on drastic measures to restore confidence in Europe and maintain the credit ratings of core economies could boost market sentiment in early 1Q12 and push the index to test the all‐time high of 1,597. However, the reality check on the implication of European austerity measures and rising market risk premium due to the 13th General Election (GE) could push the index around 1,200 levels in 1H12 based on a minus two standard deviation from its last decade’s historical mean of 16.6x.

A revival should ensue in the following months due to oversold conditions and anticipation of a subsequent recovery in Eurozone economy by mid‐2013 as markets move ahead by about six months. Our end‐2012 target is 1,520 based on a mid‐cycle PER of 13x.

Malaysia – Not Insulated

In the first nine months of 2011, the Malaysian economy registered a modest growth of 5.1% YoY thanks to the robust domestic demand and strong exports. In some ways, despite the turbulent external environment, rebuilding and reconstruction activities in Japan had helped spur Malaysia’s exports advancement during 3Q11. Nevertheless, the external sector is expected to remain challenging in 4Q11 before embracing a slowdown in 2012 amid the budget deficit cuts in the European Union, the slow economic rebound in the US and the anticipated softening of China’s economy. Hence, we expect Malaysia’s economic growth to narrow to 4.6% in 2012 following a 5.2% growth expectation for 2011.

On the fiscal front, the financial status of the Federal Government may continue to improve in tandem with the embodiment of fiscal prudence and boost in revenue. Overall consumer prices are expected to increase by 2.5% while monetary policy is expected to remain accommodative (OPR stable at 3.0%). A potential wild card is the reform agenda initiated by Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak. Factors that would accelerate reform include:

1. increasing political consciousness and demographic shift,
2. reenergizing investment in the local economy, and
3. strengthening fiscal credibility. Sectors that could benefit are Banking, Property and Power.

Political Risk?

We strongly believe the country’s 13th general election will be due in 1QFY12, especially before the parliament convenes in March. This could be a major dampener upon dissolution of the parliament as investors would exit and remain on the sideline until the outcome is known and the implications are digested. The ruling coalition is expected to retain its victory but its grip on parliamentary and state seats are expected to weaken. Thus, the effectiveness in implementation of policy reforms and domestic expansionary measures could be compromised and will be closely watched in 2012. With the backdrop of slowing external demand, spending on domestic infrastructure, construction and oil & gas sectors would be the key focus in 2012.

Investors should take profit on any rally over the next three months and wait to cherry pick. Traders should take short‐term positions to trade, mainly on blue chips, in anticipation of a year‐end and New Year rallies and exit by March. We expect higher downside risks in 1H12 as the flow of negative economic data, earnings downgrades and possible 13th general election hurt investor sentiment.

Top Picks for 2012

We reiterate defensive approach in stock selection in current uncertain period and bottom up approach in choosing value picks. Preferred buy picks are KIANJOO (TP: RM2.58), SEG (TP: RM2.51), SUNWAY (TP: RM3.16), BJTOTO (TP: RM4.92), BSTEAD (TP: RM6.21), KPJ (TP: RM5.04), GENM (TP: RM4.50), SAPCRES (TP: RM4.93), GAMUDA (TP: RM3.71) and SIME (TP: RM10.12).

Source: TA Securities

Should State Government involve in Business?

In Malaysia, we can see a lot of businesses being conducted by state government. Should there be a limit to the extent that state government should involved in? Yes, we know that the state also need money to run their administrations daily operations expenses. But, would it be wise to collect revenue generated by businesses in the state, instead of relying of its own businesses?

Well, doing businesses by state government itself can generate more revenue. This is the case only if the businesses were run successfully and making profits. Otherwise, the businesses' losses were barred by rakyat themselves.

Why we only highlight State Government?

Simply because most of the state government is making losses. In fact, only one state is making profit and still it is highly indebted. By going back to history, we know how that state wrest control of one reputable fast-food chain business, which became its cash-cow now. Then, the money from this cash-cow is spinning around within the group. Is this what we called successful?

Recently, another state government intend to open cafes, convenient shops, and even hardware. There's nothing wrong with that as long as the following criteria was fulfilled:

1. The right person was being installed into the business


2. Good governance was being conducted regularly and strictly


3. Not in conflict with the current and future business owners within the same industry

All Malaysians know that, when businesses were blended with politics, anything can happen (the ugly way). Corruptions, frauds, bureaucracy, is all we already learn from the past. In business, it's very hard to sleep with competitors. To eliminate competition, can I limit the issuance of permit for certain businesses? Can I withdrew the licenses given? Can I stop renewing the licenses when due? Ordinary folks like us cannot, but state government can.

Bush visiting a hardware shops

Fair and Open market is all we want. For me, all the three criteria mentioned above are difficult to abide. If failed, votes will swing the other side. State government should facilitate, understand, and help rakyat to set up their businesses. If all businesses were conducted by governments, we are moving backward to be a communist country.

Sarawak state election 2011: BN to lose 2/3 majority?

Coming this Saturday, 16th April 2011, the Sarawak state elections will be held and Malaysians will be watching closely on the outcome. Of course, I do not know the outcome yet. In fact, I am afraid to predict it, as the "not so good" result will jeopardize my share investments. I am not a Sarawakian either, what should I gauge against? As Chinese said, outsiders tends to be clearer than insiders. As such, Finance Malaysia refer to the following article taken from Credit Suisse as a reference, a view from foreigners.

BN's 'fixed deposit' will be put to test?

The Sarawak state elections will be a key barometer for Prime Minister Najib to gauge the support for Malaysians for the incumbent Barisan Nasional (BN). While previous state elections were seen to be non-events, as Sarawak has always been BN stronghold, these particular polls will likely be the most hotly contested. This round, for BN to lose the 2/3 majority, it will need to lose 24 seats or an additional 15 seats.

4 Disadvantages to BN

1. "Bible"
• On the surface, the 'Bible' issue has been resolved, but this issue could have hit a sour note with the Christian voters. To recap, the row over the use of Malay-language Bibles centers on the use of word 'Allah' for God.
• 43% of Sarawakians are Christians
2. "Native customary rights"
• There are supposedly over 200 pending cases over the 'native customary rights' land problems. These cases are seeking to overturn the directive made by the Minister for Resources Planning in Sarawak to extinguish their native customary rights and revert the land to the Sarawak government.
• 56% of total voter population in Sarawak are natives
3. Taib's alleged immense wealth
• Chief Minister of Sarawak, Taib has ruled Sarawak for 30 years. The opposition has highlighted Taib family's alleged immense wealth and businesses. The key Chinese party in Taib's stable, SUPP, will likely be taking the brunt of the Chinese's hostile sentiment towards Taib.
4. Poverty in Sarawak
• Accusations of money politics and corruption could surface during the Sarawak state elections, as the level of poverty is one of the highest in Malaysia, although Sarawak is one of the riches states in natural resources (oil, gas, timber and palm oil).

What would be the outcome?

BN currently has 87% of the state seats. Credit Suisse believe that BN will lose more seats but will unlikely lose the 2/3 majority. This suggests that BN will hold the General Elections in 2012 (and not 2011), which is good news for the stock market, as the government will have to dish out more 'goodies' and continue spending.

What if there's a political tsunami?

It would be a buying opportunity. If the voters swing significantly to the opposition, we look to the 8 March 2008 general elections to gauge the impact on the stock market. If the unexpected happens, we conclude that a knee-jerk downward reaction would provide a buying opportunity for fundamentally-strong stocks as they should outperform once the shock wears off.

Credit Suisse Top Picks

PetChem, CIMB, Axiata, Genting, Gamuda, AirAsia, IJM Corp, UEM Land and RHB Cap.

Source: Credit Suisse

How far could Oil price RISES?

As usual, another episodes of tension in the Middle East pushes global oil prices higher, and surpassing $100 per barrel this time. We did seen this kind of scenario before in the Middle East during 1973-74, 1979, and the Iraq war in 1990. Are there any different this time?

Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi

By Credit Suisse, 

We believe the rise in oil prices is manageable. Each 10% rise in oil prices only takes about 0.1% off global GDP and 0.2% off US growth. With Western wage growth muted, central banks are unlikely to raise rates on account of oil alone.

Our analysts see oil prices below $100 pb this year, supported by the following reason which differs from previous oil crisis:-

1. There is enough spare capacity in the global oil market to deal with supply-side disruptions as long as they are not too extreme
2. The energy intensity of global GDP has fallen by around 40% over the past 40 years
3. There is unlikely to be the same inflationary follow-through as in the 1970s
4. Oil producers are spending their windfall gains

Yahoo Finance: Oil prices since 28th Feb 2011

Potential Losers

Among the countries that are both significant energy importers and where energy accounts for a large part of the CPI basket, we would highlight India, Czech Republic and Poland. We note that China has the fiscal strength to subsidize higher energy prices, while other countries (namely India and Thailand) may not.

Potential Winners

In our view, the potential winners are countries that are net energy exporters and that have a positive output gap. This highlights Russia, Columbia, Australia, Canada, Malaysia and Norway.

The outlook for oil prices...

We believe that the oil price should fall from here. Saudi Arabia is likely to release some of its oil reserves into the market as it perceives a high oil price to be supportive for the Iranian government. Our house view is that oil price could falls below $100. We would only be concerned if the political unrest in the Middle East were to spread to Saudi Arabia.

* This is just an excerpt from Credit Suisse Research report dated 1 March 2011. This may not informative enough for readers to come to a conclusion.

Related Posts:
When would asset bubbles in Emerging Market "Burst"?

University Campus Election?

Even before the much awaited general election, our universities under-graduates are up for the upcoming campus elections. Candidates are going all out, day and night, to campaign for votes for the past few days. Election will be held from Feb 21 to Feb 24.

News excerpt from The Star newspaper (17 Feb 2011)

Successfully, every year, campus election which initially meant for universities only, got the attention of public and full coverage from major dailies. Malaysian is like watching European Cup (campus election), prior to the more important FIFA World Cup (general election). Meanwhile, politician tends to monitor the progress of the campus elections for various reasons:

1. Read the minds of undergraduates
2. Identify the potential future politicians
3. Predicting the youth trends on politics

Penggerak Mahasiswa or Pro-Mahasiswa?

Not surprisingly, campus elections are heated up once again this year. As a graduate from one of Malaysia's public university, it reminded me on campus election. those days Brochures and banners seen every corner. Ceramah-ceramah by candidates are being held here and there. But, to be honest, I'm really not sure who are the candidates and what is their promises and whether those promises materialized.

At USM, Pro-Mahasiswa candidates and supporters campaigning in the campus. (SinChew Daily)

Finance Malaysia is wondering:

Why we have these campus election at the first place?

And, is it wise to have it?

Or, should we amend it?
 

They says that campus election can build the charisma of undergraduates who are the future leaders. But, other than campus election, there is no other ways to instill such good values to our undergraduates nowadays? You must be joking...

In campus election, one can win the election by simply campaigning for few days to fish vote, and gone missing for the whole year. If this is your purpose of having campus election, our future politicians would be worse. It is wasting time and money.

News excerpt from mStar online reporting a scuffle happens at UKM which needed the help of FRU last year.

Very often, government is blamed by undergraduates for not allowing them to involve in politics. Reasons being for the benefit of undergraduates and to encourage them to just focus on their studies. But then, why allowed them to involve in campus election? Is it totally unrelated between campus election and politics? You must be fooling yourself if you said no...

In my opinion, we should either ALLOW or NOT ALLOW. By allowing, please let them to engage in politics freely. Otherwise, please abolish such campus election totally to let them focus on their studies 100%. Do not please our undergraduates simply because you forbidding them to engage in politics, and you do not want to arouse their anger at the same time.