Personal Income Tax for YA2012

Finance Malaysia hopes this article doesn't come late to give you some info on Personal Income Tax filling for year of assessment 2012. Maybe due to the general election, which had diverts our attention lately. Lol. Anyway, do remember to file your income tax before 30th April oh!!!

Well, here is the list of Personal Tax Relief for YA2012. And, I would like to highlight to you, in RED color words, some changes/differences from previous year.

Personal Tax Relief for YA2012

• Item No.11:
  This would replace Item 10 from YA2012-YA2017 with higher amount of RM6,000
• Item No.23:
  Private Retirement Scheme (PRS) is the NEW item which can help you reduce tax further with additional RM3,000 tax relief from YA2012-YA2021. As such, Item No.22 would be replaced until after YA2021.

All other items remained the same. Do reduce your tax payable by maximizing the tax relief amount. Remember to keep a record and file it properly. Happy tax filling. Thanks.

Blue color: Tax relief that we can adjust easily in our daily life

Green color: Tax relief for property not rented out with S&P signed between 10/03/09-31/12/10

Light red color: Tax relief related to child

Yellow color: Tax relief related to life insurance premium

Even the WSJournal Doesn't Get It

David Wessel has a lengthy article in this morning's Wall Street Journal about the future direction of the world's economies.  He begins with Europe and then walks the reader through the US, Japan, China, and the rest of the world.  In every case, Wessel's discussion is about government policy.

The overall theme is that economic recovery depends upon government policy, discretionary policy at that.  He discusses the twists and turns of policymakers as they, according to his story line, attempt to guide their economies to the promised land.

But, that is exactly the problem.  Once government policy becomes the determinant of the economy's future, the economy no longer has a future.  The proper role of government in a free market is to lay down the rules of the road and then to get out of the way.  Increasingly, a government of rules is not to be found.

Instead we watch daily as policy makers, who frequently have a very limited knowledge of economics, move this way and that in a vain attempt to get economic growth going.  Such things cannot work.  They never have worked and they never will.

Economic growth occurs when businesses make capital expenditures and hire workers to create product.  They aren't going to do that if they have to spend their time wondering what the next move is going to be by their government.  Government action is detrimental to an economy's future.  Government inaction and consistent application of the rules of the road is the ticket to prosperity, not frenetic political activity and polarizing rhetoric.

If Obama had played more golf and forgotten about the stimulus, Obamacare and Dodd-Frank, we would probably be looking at 4 - 5 percent unemployment today and economic growth rates of 3 1/2 to 4 percent.  Unfortunately, Obama thought he had something to contribute.  So, we stagnate.  that's the price of a responsive government.

Better To Be An Academically Uninclined Female In Singapore?

Jack and Jane were the best of friends in secondary school. Jack had always been the smarter guy who scored all As for his exams while Jane would be struggling to get just a B grade. Jack scored 8 points for O'Levels while Jane scored 20. As expected, Jack got into a top junior college while Jane enrolled at a polytechnic. Few years later, Jack achieved distinctions for his A'level exams and got accepted into a local university while Jane managed to earn her diploma and enrolled to a part-time private university programme. 

Fast forward a few years, Jack finally graduated from the local university and began looking for a job. He secured a job interview and when he arrived at the office in a tailored suit , he saw Jane. Jane was one of the interviewers. What happened?

It is proven time and time again that academic performance does not always guarantee career success. All things being equal, is the light at the end of the tunnel brighter for an academically uninclined female in Singapore? Females in Singapore have a 2 year advantage over guys who served NS. In addition to the shorter duration of a private university course compared to a local university's, private universities also offer part time degree courses, allowing students to take up a full time job in the day and gain valuable working experience while beefing up his/her resume. 

The timelines below show a clearer view of the opportunity costs of serving National Service and taking up a full time university programme :

	JC To Full-Time Local University Route
	Female	Male - Jack
Age 12	PSLE	PSLE
Age 16	O'Level	O'Level
Age 18	A'Level	A'Level
Age 19	Start of University Year 1 (June)	Army
Age 20	Start of University Year 2	Army
Age 21	Start of University Year 3	Start of University Year 1 (June)
Age 22	Start of University Year 4	Start of University Year 2
Age 23	End of University Year 4 (June)	Start of University Year 3
Age 24	First year of work @ $33600/year	Start of University Year 4
Age 25	2nd year of work @ $36000/year	End of University Year 4 (June)
Total Salary earned by age 25	$69,600.00	$0.00
Amt saved @ 20% savings rate	$13,920.00	$0.00

	Diploma to Part-Time Private University Route
	Female - Jane	Male
Age 12	PSLE	PSLE
Age 16	O'Level	O'Level
Age 18	Polytechnic 2nd year	Polytechnic 2nd year
Age 19	Earned diploma	Earned diploma
Age 20	Part Time Degree + Full Time Work @ $26400/year	Army
Age 21	Part Time Degree + Full Time Work @ $27720/year	Army
Age 22	Part Time Degree + Full Time Work @ $29106/year	Part Time Degree + Full Time Work @ $26400/year
Age 23	Full time work @ $31200/year	Part Time Degree + Full Time Work @ $27720/year
Age 24	Full time work @ $32760/year	Part Time Degree + Full Time Work @ $29106/year
Age 25	Full Time work @ $34398/year	Full time work @ $31200/year
Total Salary earned by age 25	$181,584.00	$31,200.00
Amt saved @ 20% savings rate	$36,317.00	$6,240.00

Assumptions have to be made as there are too many variations. As such, I came up with the following non-exhaustive list of assumptions for the tables above :

• No part-time job and no money saved in the 2 years of army, 3 years of diploma and 4 years of  local university
• No year-end bonus
• Annual salary increment of 5%
• Salary of full time job after diploma = $2200/month or $26400/year
• Salary of full time job after part time private university = $2600/month or $31200/year
• Salary of full time job after full time local university = $2800/month or $33600/year
• Full time job is in private sector : Male with NS same pay as female of the same rank in the company 
• Private University : 3 year course
• Local University : 4 year course
• Total tuition fees for Private & Local University assumed to be the same

In addition to the salary earned and amount saved, Jane has already accumulated 6 years of full-time working experience at the time when Jack graduated from a local university. When will Jack be able catch up?

Taming the Beast

When an economy collapses, usually with the financial sector leading the way, everyone fears that it will not soon recover.  But, history tells us otherwise.  The numerous financial and economic collapses from the end of the civil war in the US up to the start of World War I took place during the fastest spurt of economic growth in US history.  The US economy had no central bank during this period and the government was so tiny that fiscal policy was largely non-existent.  Absent modern policy tools, what happened?

What happens, when government is not around to step in, is that economies recover on their own.  That's what the period from 1865 to 1914 teaches us.  It was during that period that the US overtook other economic power houses to become, by the end of the first World War, the most powerful economic engine in the world.  That is the outcome one can expect if the central bank is non-existent and if government fiscal policy is non-existent.

But what happens when government attempts to "tame the beast?" and "reform" the economy and the markets.  After the 2008 collapse, an unprecedented effort by central banks and governments took place throughout the Western economies.  Combined with aggressive "regulatory reform" to prevent future financial collapses, political actions by western economies have attempted to "tame the beast" of modern capitalism for the past 4 1/2 years.

And what is the outcome of all of this government action? -- economic stagnation and distress.  Economies that chugged along with 3 - 3 1/2 percent real GDP growth and 4 - 6 percent unemployment, now face zero real GDP growth and unemployment rates between 7 1/2 percent and 30 percent (Spain, Greece).

What next?  The beast has been tamed.  The furious fires of capitalism have been successfully tapped down by government policy.  Now, policy makers have abandoned any serious effort to get free markets going again and are focused on taxing rich folks.  That is the new agenda -- move more and more activities from the private to the public sector (think health care) and go after the wealth of anyone who played by the old rules.

We now have new rules.  Bond indentures (think GM, think Stockton) can be rewritten by the judiciary and by politicians.  Raiding government protected checking accounts are now policy tools for dealing with excessive sovereign debt (think IMF recommendations on Cyprus).  Nothing is safe from the wandering policy eyes of the Obama administrations and European politicans.  Even IRA accounts in the US have now become targets of the new political elite.

The beast has been tamed.  Look for the economies in Europe and the US to roll over.  In the US, the imposition of massive tax increases, major new hikes in employee costs (Obamacare), an onslaught of new EPA regulations, and blurring of the legal status of ordinary financial contracts (GM) is enough to snuff out the tepid recovery in the US.  Absurd policies designed to increase sovereign debt in heavily indebted Europe will put the nail in the coffin for Europe.  The future is not bright.

Consolidating Credit Card Debt: 2 Easy Methods in Malaysia

Credit cards have become a part of life in Malaysia. But as much as they make life a lot more convenient; credit cards can also lead to an unmanageable amount of debt. In some cases, credit cards have even led to bankruptcies.

If you have a credit card debt that seems to be spiralling of control, it may be the right time to consider debt consolidation. In Malaysia, there are two common debt consolidation methods that are highly workable.

1) Credit Card Balance Transfer

Credit Card Balance Transfers involve the transferring of money that you owe on your current credit card account to a new credit card.

Balance transfers offer a number of different benefits, including lower interest rate and the ability to simplify your credit card debt payment process. 

How Credit Card Balance Transfers Can Work for Debt Consolidation:

●     If you have accumulated a significant amount of credit card debt, there is a good chance you are currently being charged the maximum interest rate. Based on the tiered interest rate structure adopted by banks in Malaysia, this maximum rate is generally 17.5% p.a.

●     If you are paying the maximum interest rate, you are probably finding it quite difficult to keep up with your credit card debts. High interest rates can cause your credit card balance to rise quickly. For example, if the amount you owe on your credit cards is RM10,000, you are essentially adding RM146 in interest to your debt each month.

●     A credit card balance transfer could give you a break from paying high interest. In some cases, you'll find balance transfer programmes that offer zero interest rate, at least for the first year or so. By taking advantage of one of these offers, you will have a better chance of paying your debt off.

●     Banks often charge a once-off fee of 3% when transferring a credit card balance. However, in the long run you will still end up paying less, due to the lower interest rate.

Example of How Much You Could Save:

Credit card average maximum interest rate = 17.5%

Lowest known interest rate for balance transfer (for a limited time) = 0%

Amount you could potentially save on interest (for a limited time) = 17.5%

2) Personal Loan

The concept of taking out a personal loan in order to pay off credit card debts might sound a little unusual. However, if you take a strategic approach by taking advantage of interest rate differences between personal loans and credit cards, this method can actually work quite well.

How Personal Loans Can Work for Debt Consolidation:

●     If you have accumulated a significant amount of credit card debt, there is a good chance you are currently being charged the maximum interest rate. Based on the tiered interest rate structure adopted by banks in Malaysia, this maximum rate is generally 17.5% p.a.

●     The interest rates on many personal loans are far lower than credit card maximum interest rates. For example, some personal loan interest rates in 2013 can be 9.88% p.a. or less, depending on your loan amount and term. If you are a government servant, the rate dives even lower.

●     If you take up a personal loan with significantly lower interest than a credit card’s, you could technically be paying much less over the long run. The savings you’re getting from your interest could even help offset the charges and fees associated with the application for a personal loan.

Example of How Much You Could Save:

Credit card average maximum interest rate = 17.5%

Known interest rate on a personal loan = 9.88%

Amount you could potentially save on interest = 7.62%

This article is brought to you by iMoney.my - the first website in Malaysia comparing credit cards, loans and mortgages - free of charge and independently.

Once Upon A Time

The American dream was, once upon a time, the idea that if you worked hard, postponed consumption, saved your money and invested it, you could live whatever lifestyle that you wanted.  The flip side was that if you failed, you paid the price for that failure.  That idea fueled the economic engine that made American the wealthiest country in the world.  Millions of people came to America, because of the freedom that the American dream represented -- the freedom to be who you wanted to be without the heavy hand of the government telling you what you could or could not dream.

We are now embarked, along with our friends in Europe, upon the journey to the American nightmare.  Political struggles, both in Europe and the US, are degenerating into class warfare, pitting higher incomes against lower incomes, and producing economies that no longer grow.  Massive unemployment is becoming accepted and commonplace.  The Eurozone unemployment rate exceeds 12 percent and American workers are leaving the work force to enjoy that leisure that an over-abundant "safety net" provides.

Freedom includes the freedom to fail, the freedom to make mistakes, the freedom to pay the price of your failure and your mistakes.  Once upon a time the discipline that was imposed by the freedom to fail provided the necessary incentives to succeed.  Taking away the freedom to fail with the heavy hand of government takes away the freedom to succeed.  It is not only the "too big to fail" that is the problem, it is the "too politically correct to fail" as well that eliminates the freedom necessary to make an economy successful.

Economists Who Think Incentives Don't Matter

I nominate Simon Johnson for an award as an economist who has managed to reach the remarkable conclusion that economic incentives do not matter.  He joins a long list of politicians who seem to think that government policies that take money from one group of Americans to give it to another have no effect on behavior.

Save and save and save and then find out that the government will take the proceeds of your savings away from you.  That's the message of the recent Obama message and Simon Johnson's column today in the New York Times.  Obama's new war on the IRA promises to slap the hands of any American who decided to forego that extra TV or car or who bought a house that they could afford, putting the money into an IRA account instead.

The new crime is saving, investing and accumulating assets.  According to Obama, that is un-American and he proposes bringing it to an end.  Somehow eliminating what paltry private savings the American economy generates doesn't seem to bother Obama and his economic advisers.  After all, I suppose, China can continue to supply whatever savings we need as the Chinese own an increasing share of American assets and Americans own less and less of their own country.

Meanwhile those who don't save and who splurge on consumer goods and purchase homes they cannot afford will continue to receive bailouts, special new program proposals from the Obama-led White House, and higher levels of dependency on government.  Already the number of Americans even remotely interested in working for a living is at a forty year low and the number of Americans collecting disability checks is at a record and a new record is achieved every day.

Reward the indolent and punish the thrifty and those with a work ethic -- that is the Obama mantra, ringingly endorsed by his adoring economists.  Simon Johnson thinks he hasn't gone far enough.  I suppose Johnson would like to raise the minimum wage to $ 100 an hour as well.  That should go far to eliminate poverty (at least for the handful of Americans who would still have jobs).